[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RAIDframe component replacement
>> None of these can help with that. Whenever as your RAID1 is running
>> single-member, you lose it if the live member fails.
> Yes, of course.
> But it's currently running 2-member. Is there a way to temporarily
> run it three-member and then remove the error-prone component?
Oh, I see what you mean!
I don't think there is. As far as I can tell, RAIDframe (at least as
of 4.0.1, which IIRC is what you said you're using) does not support
RAID 1 with more than two members. (FIxing that would be my preferred
fix, actually; even just making it two-or-three members would help, as
then any number of members could be done with a fixed-depth tree. But
I would guess - not having looked - that going to three would be little
if any easier than going to an arbitrary number.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |