[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pg->offset and pg->flags
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:35:04PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > Ignoring the free page allocator which abuses pg->offset, is there any
> > reason we cannot fold pg->flags into pg->offset? The lower PAGE_SHIFT bits
> > of pg->offset are not used.
> is this about making vm_page smaller? if so, and it works, i guess that
> seems fine, but how many bits do you want to use? ie, what is the
> smallest PAGE_SIZE we will support?
> if not that, why?
And is the memory saved enough to be significant compared to the
number of masking operations needed to get pg->offset.
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |