[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Bogus KASSERT() in LFS?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:25:09PM +0000, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
> I think you're right. While I'm pretty sure that curpg won't be NULL on
> the first iteration, I think it can be NULL on subsequent iterations. I'd
> commit that change.
It shouldn't get there on subsequent iterations if it pulled a NULL out
of the TAILQ because it explicitily breaks out of the loop in that case.
Why do you think it can't happen initially?
Main Index |
Thread Index |