tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel

To: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:25:57 +0000

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 08:28:42PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
 > I may be missing your point but there are other ways of sabotaging
 > the securelvel mechanism without kernel modules available.  It doesn't
 > seem like a new problem to me.  A more obvious way to be mischievous
 > for sure but not new.

PR numbers?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
  - From: Andrew Doran

Prev by Date: Re: How to make module autoloading play nice with securelevel
Next by Date: Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
Previous by Thread: Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
Next by Thread: Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index