[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kernel module loading vs securelevel
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:23:29AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > It would seem to be intentional. After all, kernel modules can
> > do all sorts of nasty things if they want to.
> In that case, module autoload/autounload is not functional at all and
> we have to specify all possible necessary modules explicitly
> during boot time??
Yes. Otherwise it's quite easy to defeat securelevel by causing the
loading of a module that resets it to -1.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |