[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Add NULL power handler to x86/ipmi(4)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 06:14:39PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Would it be sufficient for ipmi(4) to refuse to suspend (return false
> from the suspend method) if the watchdog is active?
> Or should it make some sort of effort to disable the watchdog, and
> attempt to reenable the watchdog during the subsequent resume?
The latter -- given that the same question applies generally to detachment
in the brave new modular world. Would sysmon_wdog_shutdown() be sufficient?
Main Index |
Thread Index |