Re: [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal

To: Darren Reed <darrenr%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:40:47 -0400

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:05:18AM +0200, Darren Reed wrote:
> Mateusz,
> 
> Now that NetBSD has dtrace (FBT) for the kernel, have you thought
> about how you might use write mode in dtrace to simulate failure?
> 
> Is there value in introducing specific dtrace probes (once we have
> SDT probes) to support fuzzing?

We had SDT before we had FBT.  It'd be a little surprising the other
way around!

Thor

References:
- [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal
  - From: Mateusz Kocielski
- Re: [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal
  - From: Darren Reed

Prev by Date: Re: [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal
Next by Date: Hardware RAID problem with NetBSD 5?
Previous by Thread: Re: [gsoc] syscall/libc fuzzer proposal
Next by Thread: kern/42772 -- pthread issue with fork()
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index