[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Placing lwp in uarea [was: Re: uarea swap-out]
Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost> wrote:
> If we are going to get rid of swappable uareas, then we should go all
> the way.
> The separate lwp pool should go away and the lwp should just be placed
> at the bottom of the uarea followed by the pcb. l_addr should be
> renamed l_pcb.
Here is the patch placing struct lwp in the uarea:
- Mess of macros in sys/proc.h, I think __HAVE_UAREA_TOP_LAYOUT should
rather be avoided by uarea layout unification.
- Perhaps we should revisit zombie LWP state? Separate uarea allocation
might be useful for out-of-memory case.
Main Index |
Thread Index |