[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Deferred freeing of kauth_cred_ts
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> > > The question is - why freeing is performed from interrupt context?
> > I couldn't find where sofree() might be reached from interrupt
> > context, but I might be missing something.
> Neither could I. Neither could Andy. I think we both tripped over
> the fact, unfortunately, that it could in fact happen, though.
I guess it can happen on things like tcp_close(), e.g. when connection
timeouts and it releases the last reference to the closed socket.
But even without looking much at the code - why it would be problematic
to trigger some cases with KASSERT(!cpu_intr_p() && !cpu_softintr_p())?
Main Index |
Thread Index |