Re: WD_QUIRK_FORCE_LBA48

["Jonathan A. Kollasch" <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost>]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:07:00AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> What I propose is actually conform to the standards, even more than
> what Chris proposes. The content of words (60-61) is the
> last LBA28-accessible sector+1, whatever version of the spec.
> Using this will work in all cases.
> 

I'm not sure why I wasn't excited about this proposal before,
but it looks like it should work.  I await seeing the code.

        Jonathan Kollasch