[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:59:19AM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> But, really, it's not clear to me that it's worth doing non-LBA48
> transfers at all on drives capable of LBA48 - what's the cost, two more
> command bytes per transfer? Four? And that, only for accesses below
> the 128G point.
> We might need quirks for drives that claim LBA48 but which do not
> actually work with LBA48, but I suspect there would be very few of
> them, way fewer than the current (and growing) list.
the problem is not drives, the problem is controllers.
Some IDE controllers don't support LBA48, but I don't have a list of
those. The only way to know is to try ...
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |