[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Improving RAIDframe Parity Handling: The Diff
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:55:54PM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
> If your disk is "all busy, all the time", then parity zones arn't going
> to buy you much...
Indeed. And I doubt this can or should be fixed in FFS. A log structured
file-system would probably work better in this case.
> Even if there are 500 of 4000 zones marked as 'dirty' the checking
> is still going to nearly an order of magnitude faster than before.
Even 2000 on of 4000 zones would speed up parity rebuild on my
system by over an hour. On a modern (almost) 2TB hard disk each
zone would be 0.5GB large. Not copying it around saves a lot
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |