[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation
> There is already an fstatat in the wild: [...]
> I would tend to recommend that we not use that name unless we use
> basically the semantics of the existing one.
Unless I've totally missed something, that is exactly what fstatat()
and openat() do - clone externally-invented and -specified semantics.
(Or at least what they're _intended_ to do; bugs are a fact of life.)
That's also why the horrible names, I suspect: someone said, upthread,
that these are POSIX-specified.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |