tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation

> There is already an fstatat in the wild: [...]
> I would tend to recommend that we not use that name unless we use
> basically the semantics of the existing one.

Unless I've totally missed something, that is exactly what fstatat()
and openat() do - clone externally-invented and -specified semantics.
(Or at least what they're _intended_ to do; bugs are a fact of life.)

That's also why the horrible names, I suspect: someone said, upthread,
that these are POSIX-specified.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index