[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 03:30:12PM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > I took the time to write a function that crahses the kernel on
> > purpose. Compiled as non static function, ddb showed me the function
> > name and function call trace with proper function names. Quite easy
> > to locate the faulty spot. To complete my test, I compiled the very
> > same code with all functions declared static. Now the ddb trace does
> > not show me the function names, making it a lot harder to locate the
> > faulty spot.
> you want __noinline?
I think so, yeah. But maybe we need another macro which does 'static'
either way, but only does __noinline if !DIAGNOSTIC (or !DEBUG)? I think
that is approximately what Marc wants.
Main Index |
Thread Index |