tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Porting uticom(4)

I will keep firmload(9) in mind, thanks.

I can easily create a blob from any of the firmware, I just don't
know how the GPL for the linux blob fits in. I mentioned the linux
blob because I was uncertain about the copyright/licensing differences
between OpenBSD and DragonFlyBSD and was unable to find the same
firmware on TI's website.

Iain Hibbert wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Yorick Hardy wrote:

The choice in firmware leads to different implementations of uticom.

Which firmware should I use?

I vote for the blob. You can load it directly with firmload(9) and it
doesn't need to bloat out the kernel..


Kind regards,

Yorick Hardy

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index