Re: Common chmod and chown routines

[Elad Efrat <elad%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:52 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
<yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost> wrote:

> given that these functions fail into the same category as
> the existing vaccess, these function names and the argument order
> (a credential as the first argument) seem weird to me.

Give me the function prototypes you're interested in and I'll change it
unless someone else has yet another better idea.

If it isn't obvious yet, I'm interested in the centralized functionality
and couldn't care less about naming, argument order, etc.

-e.