re: kinfo_proc * 2

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

   In article <loom.20090111T172225-563%post.gmane.org@localhost>,
   ttw  <ttw+bsd%cobbled.net@localhost> wrote:
   >Christos Zoulas <christos <at> astron.com> writes:
   >> The old one (kinfo_proc) is kept for compatibility. I don't think that
   >> it is used anymore.
   >
   >thanks, do you know if there is there is a process for expiring it is
   >it expected to just remain indefinately or is it for compatibility
   >with a specific older target that will remain?
   
   We need to look first if it is used anymore. Then the standard deprecation
   is to move it to compat/sys... We really don't remove things for binary
   compatibility but maybe we should :-)

yeah - we should move it to compat dir.


in other news, in testing a.out binaries on sparc & sparc64 i've
noticed that static works but dynamic gets a SEGV soon after it
mmap's ld.so..


.mrg.