Re: setsockopt() compat issue

[Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost>]

Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:57:59PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > > The only thing that having int 64 bits solves is programs that assume
> > > sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) keep working, while making life more difficult
> > > in general because you are not going to have a primitive type for 16 or
> > > 32 bit numbers.
> > Huh? What happened to short now?
>
> you have short be either 16 or 32 bits, and you miss the primitive type
> for the other one.

They say that the eyes are the first things that go blind.
I read an "and" where it said "or". :-)

        Johnny