Re: setsockopt() compat issue

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:07:22PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >I don't understand the point of your argument. What *purpose* is
> >served by making "int" 64 bits wide? What problem are you trying to
> >solve?
> 
> How about the fact that the C standard says that an int should be the 
> "native word size of the hardware"?

And how do you define "native word size" ? on x86_64 you have instructions
to manipulate 8, 16, 32 and 64bits quantities, so all could be considered
native.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--