Re: Status of revivesa

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:16:30PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > 
> > How many users will actually be screwed seriously with SA,
> > rather than pleased by advantages on other features?
> 
> Anyone who naively expects a 3.x or 4.x chroot environment to work.
> Unfortunately, important things like named were linked to the
> SA libpthread for *two* major releases...

I don't ask who is, but asking tradeoff against other new features.

How many users will require both 5.0 kernel and
chroot old environments with pthread binaries?

Why won't they update named while they do their kernels?
pthread support for named has been disabled in both netbsd-3 and netbsd-4.

Are chroot environments confirmed working with revivesa? Not yet.
---
Izumi Tsutsui