Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device

To: Juan RP <xtraeme%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:41:23 -0400

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:27:11AM +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> 
> Thanks to this suggestion, ataraid(4) with an Intel MatrixRAID
> controller is working fully with multiple volumes:

I'm still baffled: what rebuilds these if a component fails while the
system is running?

Thor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan RP

References:
- ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan Romero Pardines
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Quentin Garnier
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan Romero Pardines
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Adam Hamsik
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan Romero Pardines
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Adam Hamsik
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan Romero Pardines
- Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
  - From: Juan RP

Prev by Date: Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
Next by Date: Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
Previous by Thread: Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
Next by Thread: Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index