[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
>Ok, why _still_ the 40% in sys/arch has the obsoleted style?
Because there's no immediate reason to change it.
Don't get me wrong. I would love to see completely universal adoption of the
C99 type names; they are better and more expressive, and more clearly defined
But that's not a good enough reason to go around changing substantial hunks of
Main Index |
Thread Index |