[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 13:26:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> I've looked to the share/misc/style and observed recommended style for
> C99 unsigned fixed width types.
> Proposal is to fix current code base to recommended style accordingly.
> The simple script can do it, f.e. for sys/arch:
> find sys/arch -type f | grep -vw CVS | xargs perl -pi -e
I think there's no pressing need to go to c99 types that would warrant
a bulk conversion. Also, iirc, some of that is 3rd party code, and we
need to be careful not to introduce unnecessary diffs with the
Current policy w.r.t. u_ types is to "fix them as you go", i.e. if you
want to make changes to a file with u_ types, you might as well
convert it to use c99 u types (in a separate commit). That way the
churn is minimized, and that the change is actually verified.
uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
Main Index |
Thread Index |