On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:22:15AM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote: [...] > At the moment, the high value prevents us from supporting > sysconf(_SC_SEM_VALUE_MAX), assuming that we do _not_ want to have two > different values for the same thing. > What would we loose if we lowered the value of SEM_VALUE_MAX by half? I don't think there is much use for a semaphore value in the range 2 billions to 4 billions. I think we can go with lowering it and nobody will ever notice. -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "See the look on my face from staying too long in one place [...] every time the morning breaks I know I'm closer to falling" KT Tunstall, Saving My Face, Drastic Fantastic, 2007.
Description: PGP signature