[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bad KASSERT in buffer cache code
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:45:19PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:28:23PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> > hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost said:
> > > How should MSDOS fire on bp->b_vp->v_tag != VT_UFS ?
> > No idea. Is there a good reason for fs specific assumptions
> > in generic buffer code?
> > > Do you have a backtrace?
See also kern/38892, which are a few more instances of this issue with stacks
attached. I presume the fix to the KASSERT should fix those as well (Manuel
filed the original bug, I tripped over another instance of it and attached my
backtrace as well). Please update that PR if you fix this.
Time is an illusion; lunchtime, doubly so. |/\/\| Rafal Boni
-- Ford Prefect |\/\/|
Main Index |
Thread Index |