[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time
Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> For a sleep ~497 days into the future at 100Hz, yes. Perhaps uint64_t would
> be better.
Just a detail, but is not that ~497 days for 1000Hz, and ~4971 days for 100Hz?
yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> is it necessary for eg. cv_time_sec to return errors?
> isn't it enough to simply return the value of hardclock_ticks and
> let cv_timedwait handle it?
Separate thing, but while changing this.. Could hardclock_ticks be made
unsigned? I would say uint32_t. Perhaps same for other *hz counters.
Main Index |
Thread Index |