tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Make condition variables take absolute wakeup time

Andrew Doran <> wrote:
> For a sleep ~497 days into the future at 100Hz, yes. Perhaps uint64_t would
> be better.

Just a detail, but is not that ~497 days for 1000Hz, and ~4971 days for 100Hz? (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> is it necessary for eg. cv_time_sec to return errors?
> isn't it enough to simply return the value of hardclock_ticks and
> let cv_timedwait handle it?

Separate thing, but while changing this.. Could hardclock_ticks be made
unsigned? I would say uint32_t. Perhaps same for other *hz counters.

Best regards,

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index