[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Kernel preemption
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:13:34PM +0100, Andrew Doran wrote:
> The below patch implments in-kernel preemption for the i386 port.
Is in-kernel preemption really worthwhile on multiprocessor machines?
Given fine-grained locking it's not clear that it really helps much
with scheduler latency, and it adds potentially quite a bit of
overhead because you have to fiddle with interrupts for all spinlocks
rather than just those that are touched by interrupt code. Plus it
makes per-cpu stuff that much harder to work with.
The last time I thought hard about this (about a year ago) I concluded
it wasn't really a good idea, but I'm open to corrections.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |