[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Journaling patches
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:05:20PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > There is one other behavioural change. You now need to use the "-f"
> > option to mount a dirty filesystem. I'm not sure of the original reason
> > for this, and am not sure if this behaviour is desirable or not. Any
> > comments?
> Why? The whole idea with journaling is that once you play the journal, the
> file system is consistent. So why need -f?
> Yes, things can happen, which is why we still have fsck. But I think we
> shouldn't need -f with a journal.
Oh, I wasn't clear enough .. the non-journaled case now requires -f to
mount an unclean filesystem with the current WAPBL patch. The journaled
case works as you describe/expect.
Main Index |
Thread Index |