[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Time to deprecate crash dump support in stats tools (or KVM-grovelers in general)?
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:43:57 -0700
Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost> wrote:
> NetBSD has taken great steps recently to modernize its kernel. One
> of those steps has been to use per-CPU data for various subsystems
> (and the list of subsystems employing this technique to gain MP
> scalability is increasing).
> One of the upshots of moving to per-CPU data is that the data must
> be collated in order to be reported. This works well on live
> systems where sysctl is available. It doesn't work so well on crash
> dumps; the tools then have to know the specifics of how per-CPU data
> is managed for that particular subsystem and collate the data
> Given this, I think it's time to deprecate crash dump support in
> these tools (e.g. netstat(1)), and, more generally, deprecate
> KVM-groveling except in some very specific circumstances.
What you say makes sense -- but is there a better way to get certain
data from crash dumps? Or are you saying we should just live without
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |