Re: documenting loadable kernel modules

[Elad Efrat <elad%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

> 5) Any comment about secmodel_bsd44 LKM? I know it is not built at this 
> time.

At the time, I used it to test whether having the security model as an
LKM worked (it did).

I understand there's a new kernel module system in the works, so I'm
waiting for Andrew to give the green light and then probably will see
what needs to be done to convert. I may also introduce several other
security models and/or extensions...

-e.