[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Processor sets, affinity, real-time extensions
On Jun 2, 10:15am, "Mindaugas R." wrote:
} jnemeth%victoria.tc.ca@localhost (John Nemeth) wrote:
} > Also, will there be a way to forcibly remove all processes from a
} > processor regardless of affinity and cease scheduling any processes on
} > it? I'm thinking this would be useful if you discover there is some
} > kind of problem with the processor or you want to physically remove the
} > processor from the machine.
} Processor-sets are designed for that.
} cpuctl(8) disables running of user-threads completely.
cpuctl(8) offline says:
Bound LWPs will continue to be executed on the
CPU, and device interrupts routed to the CPU will continue to be han-
Is this still true, since it doesn't meet the needs mentioned above?
}-- End of excerpt from "Mindaugas R."
Main Index |
Thread Index |