On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> No. There's some code that is supposed to balance interrupts over cpus,
> but I think it is utterly broken.

Just to clarify -- the interrupts are scheduled to arrive at a specific
CPU for the APIC case. The code is supposed to do a round-robin
selection, but I don't think that code is working. You can enforce that
interrupts arrive at a specific CPU by manually changing the right field
when the interrupt is currently not routed. There is no API for that
yet.

Joerg