Subject: Re: remplacing page mappings behind uvm
To: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/01/2007 13:58:34
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:15:16AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20071201005108.GA17581@antioche.eu.org>,
> Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com> wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >> Now that I'm thinking about it, it should be possible to create a
> >> uvm_object backed mapping in the ioctl calls, isn't it ?
> >I played with this, it seems to work. See the attached privcmd.c
> >There is a wired entry accounting issue I still need to solve,
> >which I think is related to MMAPBATCH, but it looks promising.
> - please use the __ versions of the defines: instead of foo use __foo__
Yes. I commited this.
> - don't use // comments in c.
Of course. This is was a work in progress, I won't commit it as is :)
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference