Subject: Re: remplacing page mappings behind uvm
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/01/2007 02:15:16
In article <20071201005108.GA17581@antioche.eu.org>,
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> Now that I'm thinking about it, it should be possible to create a
>> uvm_object backed mapping in the ioctl calls, isn't it ?
>I played with this, it seems to work. See the attached privcmd.c
>There is a wired entry accounting issue I still need to solve,
>which I think is related to MMAPBATCH, but it looks promising.
- please use the __ versions of the defines: instead of foo use __foo__
- don't use // comments in c.