Subject: Re: remplacing page mappings behind uvm
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@astron.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/01/2007 02:15:16
In article <20071201005108.GA17581@antioche.eu.org>,
Manuel Bouyer  <bouyer@antioche.eu.org> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> Now that I'm thinking about it, it should be possible to create a
>> uvm_object backed mapping in the ioctl calls, isn't it ?
>> 
>
>I played with this, it seems to work. See the attached privcmd.c
>There is a wired entry accounting issue I still need to solve,
>which I think is related to MMAPBATCH, but it looks promising.
>
- please use the __ versions of the defines: instead of foo use __foo__
- don't use // comments in c.

christos