Subject: Re: killing the "l" argument from vfs
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/26/2007 08:00:04
> On Nov 25, 6:47pm, email@example.com (Antti Kantee) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: killing the "l" argument from vfs
> | Can you be a bit more specific about what you mean? Do you mean if NFS
> | would need it in componentname now or in the future due to iothreads?
> In componentname now... I haven't thought about iothreads.
i believe cn_lwp should die as well.