-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Nov 24, 2007, at 05:25, De Zeurkous wrote:

> On Sat, November 24, 2007 10:11, Marco Trillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/24/07, De Zeurkous <zeurkous@nichten.info> wrote:
>>> On Sat, November 24, 2007 02:05, Michael Lorenz wrote:
>>>> On Nov 23, 2007, at 20:04, De Zeurkous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Of course, the chance of having something progressive as this  
>>>>> taken
>>>>> seriously by the NetBSD term is probably near-zero. I'm willing  
>>>>> to be
>>>>> proven wrong, but realistically this is not going to happen.
>>>>
>>>> You're welcome to actually /write/ that code.
>>>
>>> Just because I know the Right Thing to do, I need to implement it by
>>> myself? Of course, you don't have an ethical obligation to do the  
>>> Right
>>
>> But then, why are you complaining that 'is not goin to happen' if you
>> won't do it?
>
> Perhaps because I am extremely busy doing the Right Thing in other
> projects?

But you still have enough time to complain here? Can't be all that  
busy then.

> If no-one has standing objections, I consider my theory accepted  
> and I expect an experimental implementation by the kernel  
> developers to follow.

You can consider and expect whatever you want as long as you want -  
no response means nobody could be arsed to respond, nothing else.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR0hCespnzkX8Yg2nAQL5AQgArrLONNtlHV4edFcnmm+ZyllpfKGVs+SE
4a/roDglbP5E++Zw2XJ1zlstP3GOs0IBnfagNdVJf6BLPTU+NxQRjz4lrHPs3FKb
cU2v+oCsj9a+DZDAKbgxEtRMV80hjialycxLc0I8WFIc57lZtdhfDByJMr7+/ped
zZTdWvksY9KRAmOK/7EOdMzXLvTewQSFW+eAhXapBPWU/RZ1emM2qycdoCmNJm9S
emRHhjhFW+miBR1jd7vKPyfUMJeO3lt85PF/5/ACNU3WABtX6HibypuL3V5GYwqB
YdvB9NWI3GdI6RNWa7VJbAJoXnCWPpFZ/z+OeY1cam9IsfXeVnhEdg==
=TAth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----