-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Nov 23, 2007, at 20:04, De Zeurkous wrote:

> Of course, the chance of having something progressive as this taken
> seriously by the NetBSD term is probably near-zero. I'm willing to be
> proven wrong, but realistically this is not going to happen.

You're welcome to actually /write/ that code.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR0eHAspnzkX8Yg2nAQJxNwgApsoZt0Xtayvo1anezxK6ZLjD1NAMUJvv
QcFScbd+g6pAV2mk1S5YBV2K7/C3nblt2DoOV2sj4QGw28zIE9LJ5doEp8mcH/NI
1ZznzKUVk5WdTpIOCce6OM5syRwpjOKAnbqTRnKZpBJEPIVA7mzwuv3ep/d/1QAO
Bw9INoKnoYeMeTWS9luvcjLEtbyiy1o0kibesFIR1TLYV1LhMJ/yojYlbBtluAiz
baJmoJOJAnnKN61/QTUwgHeuxYlAQ9FNnV++/Dkgj1uOT14wsl1tCTgQ4tUkxm78
1dmNEF15saD5hUEJnBhCC49eXJLtpoNh2fbR8n86nwv721zQuWLUeA==
=apHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----