Subject: Re: ISA direct config of ACPI devices
To: Quentin Garnier <email@example.com>
From: Jared D. McNeill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/23/2007 12:42:12
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> So yes, it assumes the ACPI tree the vendor provides makes some kind of
> sense (granted, that might be a big assumption, but I have yet to see a
> table where it is untrue), but if it's not the case, it's not fatal:
> acpi0 will try to attach unclaimed nodes at the end of the process.
> You can see an example of the resulting dmesg here:
This looks good. Have you tried a standard GENERIC kernel to see how it
behaves on both modern and non-ACPI PCs?