Subject: Re: Last remaining insque / remque uses
To: Iain Hibbert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Date: 11/09/2007 19:12:44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:24:14AM +0000, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> However, if the usage is removed from coda as per my other suggestion,
> then this is the only thing left using insque/remque - we could do as Tom
> suggested and embed them inside the netiso code as below. Its somewhat
> cleaner and just as cheap - but is it good enough?
> - remque(&el->el_qhdr);
> + iso_remque(&el->el_qhdr);
Why shouldn't it? At least as an intermediate measure, it's fine IMO
(and it would allow easliy resurrecting the x.25 related stuff if=20
somebody needs it in the future).
I've tested it on -current as well as backported to 4.0_RC4 (both
with 4.0_RC3 userland) for CLTP on CLNP on the Ethernet LAN.
I say - (check that the Copyright Notice and License that goes with insque
/remque is in iso.c, then) commit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----