Subject: Attaching children to cpu (e.g coretemp* at cpu?) ?
To: None <>
From: Juan RP <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/29/2007 21:22:28

a few people prefered to make coretemp(4) a real autoconf(9) driver
rather than an option, I've heard complaints about options being
unhelpful for LKMs for example.

Currently we do have "options INTEL_CORETEMP" and registers a driver
per struct cpu_info pointer via identcpu.

I've implemented "coretemp* at cpu?". Do we want to use this approach
rather than an option?

IMHO it's more logical to me to attach coretemp(4) at cpu, because there's
a sensor per cpu.

Juan Romero Pardines	- The NetBSD Project	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish