On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:52:32PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Tom Spindler wrote:
> 
> > > 3 if_eon.c         eonrtrequest   269 remque(&el->el_qhdr);
> 
> > Given that many of these pieces of sh^W^W^Wlovely source files
> > don't actually bother using 'struct queue', and far more often
> > monkey around with the affected structures themselves - it might
> > be better to just embed local copies of the routines into the
> > affected sources. (As the defs are all of five lines of code each,
> > I don't think it'd be a horrible burden.)
> 
> 'options EON' brings in the eon code, which accounts for one of these
> usages, patch below. It builds but I can't test it as I have no idea what
> EON is. If it a) looks fine, or b) somebody can test then I'll commit
> that.
> 
> (the list is otherwise unused, it could as easily be removed)
> 
> I was looking at the other netiso usages and yeah, that code is gangly..
> how much effort is too much effort for this?

Does anyone use/test/maintain netiso on NetBSD-current?  If we cannot
get a maintainer, then I think that we should delete it before 5.0.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24