In article <20071018111150.GA18194@drowsy.duskware.de>,
Martin Husemann  <martin@duskware.de> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Ok, I personally do not like to use int64_t here amd implicitly relying
>on the fact that it is just the same as quad_t in sysctl (nor will I go
>on a sweep to fix quad->int64 for sysctl right now) - but if people prefer
>this, ok.
>
>The previous patch was not complete, here is a full (working) version.
>
>Noone asked for compatibility yet, so I won't bother.

Looks good to me.

christos