On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:05:12AM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> following on from this, it appears that most of the DVACT_DEACTIVATE code
> we have in our tree will never be run. I was inclined to fix this as Blair
> is busy on other tasks, but he says that he was advised that perhaps
> foo_activate() is the wrong way to go about this and it should be
> redesigned.  I agree but I'm not going to go that far, is anybody else
> working on this?  (I'm thinking jmcneill-pm branch?)

jmcneill-pm will most likely obsolete deactivate/activate.

Joerg