On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Andrew Doran wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:50:16PM +0100, Andrew Doran wrote:

>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:27:34PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>> Either we degrade a lot more gracefully than Linux under load, or there's
>> an artifact in the Linux graph.  The current plot makes it impossible to
>> tell which, though.

> (...stuff removed...)

> In the long run Linux will beat NetBSD.

Why is this?

I don't know any fundamental reason this should be so.

Thanks,

-Mike