Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/30/2007 20:21:21
> > - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
> > Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?
> > - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> > If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
> > christos
> at a glance, i tend to object. i'll take a look closely in this weekend.
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
my understanding is:
- it isn't necessary for AT_SUN_EXECNAME.
(as exec is done by a pathname)
- it isn't enough for procfs. (rename, etc)
is it right?