Subject: Re: Thread benchmarks
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org, current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Bernd Ernesti <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/29/2007 09:04:24
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:42:08PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote:
> Andrew Doran wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >> It would be interesting if you could include x86 Solaris in future
> >> benchmarks.
> >It would be a brighter place if you stopped pushing people around and
> >weren't such a deadweight. How about you benchmark it?
> Andrew, there's a lot of merit in including Solaris10/OpenSolaris
> benchmarks in the result as that's where a lot of big databases run
> today...numbers from [Open]Solaris are much more relevant in this
> type of measure than OpenBSD - they're only relevant
> if we want to see want NetBSD 2.0 or older was like.
Darren, thats maybe a reason for a benchmark and not how Perry did ask
in his usual way (I can understand Andrews response).
Andrew, thank you very much for all the work you are doing here.