Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: None <>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/28/2007 11:09:03
> - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
>   Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?


> - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
> christos

at a glance, i tend to object.  i'll take a look closely in this weekend.