Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/28/2007 11:09:03
> - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
> Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?
> - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
at a glance, i tend to object. i'll take a look closely in this weekend.