Subject: Re: second pass at the "store the path of the executable in struct
To: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
From: Darren Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/28/2007 00:29:25
Christos Zoulas wrote:
> - Uses reference counted paths and malloc().
> Should it use kmem_alloc() instead?
> - Are the names of the reference-counted path functions ok?
> If I don't hear any objections, I'll commit it.
I can see that the name can be accessed via procfs.
Should (and can) we also add something to kinfo_proc?
(That is, something not restricted by COMMLEN.)