Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:22:58PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote:
> > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> are there objections to add
> >> aprint_{normal,naive,error,debug,verbose}_{dev,ifnet}
> >> that take a device_t or struct ifnet * as first argument and prefix the
> >> message with the device name or interface name? This is similiar to
> >> device_printf in FreeBSD and quite a bit shorter than writing
> >> device_xname() all over the place.
> >>   
> >
> > Why do you want to make the severity/type of message (normal, naive, etc) 
> > part of
> > the function name and not an argument (cf. syslog/log)?
>
> Because I am just following the existing convience. I also think that it
> is very important that this things are constants as it would allow
> optimising away e.g. debug automatically if that it is desired.
>   

Indeed, my apologies for not being aware of this.
/brick people who came up with this

Darren