> yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > Any better suggestions? Thoughts?
> > 
> > have you considered something more general like solaris's resource pools api
> > or linux containerfs, on which pset_* api can be implemented if desired?
> 
> Not yet, that is a second stage :)
> 
> OK, preparing for that is reasonable. In such case we might do the same as
> Solaris - use psetid_t as a system-wide ID, which might be assigned to
> some analog of resource pool, or anything we want later.

i don't like progressive development of api if it yields
unnecessary compat code as a result.

YAMAMOTO Takashi